Kylebooker NEW FISHPOND FIREHOLE BACKPACK vs. Orvis & Redington: A Comprehensive Comparison
For avid anglers, having the right backpack can make a world of difference in terms of convenience, durability, and functionality. The Kylebooker NEW FISHPOND FIREHOLE BACKPACK is a promising addition to the market, featuring an integrated net slot and a wader/boot pouch. But how does it stack up against similar offerings from well-known brands like Orvis and Redington? In this article, we鈥檒l compare these backpacks in terms of design, features, durability, and price to determine which one offers the best value for money.
1. Design & Features
Kylebooker NEW FISHPOND FIREHOLE BACKPACK
The Firehole Backpack stands out with its integrated net slot, allowing anglers to securely carry a fishing net without hassle. Additionally, it includes a dedicated wader/boot pouch, making it ideal for fly fishermen who need to switch between wading boots and regular footwear. The backpack also offers multiple storage compartments, including a waterproof pocket for valuables, and a hydration bladder sleeve for long fishing trips.
Orvis Pro Wading Backpack
Orvis is a trusted name in fly fishing, and their Pro Wading Backpack is designed for serious anglers. It features a removable wading boot bag, a built-in rod tube holder, and ample storage space. However, it lacks an integrated net slot, which means anglers must attach their nets externally. The backpack is water-resistant but not fully waterproof.
Redington Crosswater Backpack
The Redington Crosswater Backpack is another strong contender, offering a spacious main compartment, a front pocket for fly boxes, and a side mesh pocket for water bottles. Like the Orvis model, it does not have a built-in net slot, but it does include a separate wader compartment. The material is durable but not as rugged as the Firehole.
2. Durability & Build Quality
– Kylebooker Firehole: Made from high-denier nylon with reinforced stitching, this backpack is built to withstand rough conditions. The waterproof zippers and corrosion-resistant hardware add to its longevity.
– Orvis Pro Wading: Uses heavy-duty polyester with a TPU coating for water resistance. The stitching is strong, but some users report wear on the shoulder straps over time.
– Redington Crosswater: Constructed from 600D polyester, it鈥檚 durable but not as abrasion-resistant as the Firehole.
3. Price & Value for Money
– Kylebooker Firehole: Priced competitively, it offers more specialized features (net slot, wader pouch) at a lower cost than Orvis.
– Orvis Pro Wading: The most expensive of the three, justified by brand reputation but lacks some key features.
– Redington Crosswater: The most budget-friendly but sacrifices some durability and functionality.
Final Verdict: Which One Should You Buy?
If you want the best balance of features, durability, and price, the Kylebooker NEW FISHPOND FIREHOLE BACKPACK is the clear winner. It outperforms the Orvis and Redington models with its integrated net slot, superior waterproofing, and competitive pricing.
However, if brand loyalty matters more to you, the Orvis Pro Wading Backpack is a solid (albeit pricier) choice. The Redington Crosswater is a decent budget option but lacks the premium build of the other two.
For anglers who prioritize functionality and value, the Firehole Backpack is the best investment. Happy fishing! 馃帲